How should we judge a government?

In Malaysia, if you don't watch television or read newspapers, you are uninformed; but if you do, you are misinformed!

"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing." - Malcolm X

Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience - Mark Twain

Why we should be against censorship in a court of law: Publicity is the very soul of justice … it keeps the judge himself, while trying, under trial. - Jeremy Bentham

"Our government is like a baby's alimentary canal, with a happy appetite at one end and no
responsibility at the other. " - Ronald Reagan

Government fed by the people

Government fed by the people

Career options

Career options
I suggest government... because nobody has ever been caught.

Corruption so prevalent it affects English language?

Corruption so prevalent it affects English language?
Corruption is so prevalent it affects English language?

When there's too much dirt...

When there's too much dirt...
We need better tools... to cover up mega corruptions.

Prevent bullying now!

Prevent bullying now!
If you're not going to speak up, how is the world supposed to know you exist? “Orang boleh pandai setinggi langit, tapi selama ia tidak menulis, ia akan hilang di dalam masyarakat dan dari sejarah.” - Ananta Prameodya Toer (Your intellect may soar to the sky but if you do not write, you will be lost from society and to history.)

Wednesday, July 08, 2009

So no English for Science and Maths...

for the sake of those who lack basic command of the language. No problem, parents who value the study of English can use various ways to ensure that their own children do not lose out. The fact that it required a full cabinet to decide on this matter speaks volume of the importance in terms of support or backlash from the rural Malays.

Let's re-visit a popular joke being passed around.

This is one of the favourite emails, especially among retired teachers, who had the experience of being pissed off by the education department's ever ridiculous measures to maintain or even 'improve' pass rates. I can imagine how they must have felt being part of a scheme of things beyond their control and probably being blamed for the poor standards shown by those who passed the examinations. They must have felt a deep sense of relief and say to themselves, 'Thank God I am out of this mess!'

The example might be fictitious, maybe not for STPM, but it sure illustrates how students can be spoonfed, if need be, to ensure that they tick the right answers. I have posted before how at one time, questions set must use a fair distribution of objective answers, say from (a) to (e) and someone without looking at the questions can actually get 20% marks by just ticking all the (a)s for example.

One common way to help students pass internal examinations in the universities is to have trial examinations which are actually practice for the real examinations since the questions for the latter would be exactly the same (extreme case) or at the least, very similar. This has the effect of just concentrating on certain topics instead of having to study the full syllabus or more, in the case of external examinations.

THE WAYS THE GOVT. FOOL THEMSELVES.

The objective of STPM is to pass people?

How do you explain the fact that 87% of the students passed the exams recently, when during your father's time only 10% would have passed?

Are students getting smarter? Or are STPM questions getting easier?
Let me put things in their proper perspective.

During your grandfather's time, they would ask exam questions like:
"In what year did Parameswara founded the kingdom of Melaka ?"
The correct answer was "1402", and they found that only 10% of the students managed to answer the question correctly.

This didn't go down too well with the authorities, because the objective of the exams was to pass people. I mean, what's the point of having exams if people fail?

So later, they found another way to ask the same question:

"Parameswara founded the kingdom of Melaka in the year:
(a) 2001
(b) 2004
(c) 1986
(d) 1975
(e) 1402
Tick the correct answer."

The results were better in that 20% of the students passed.
But it was still not good enough, so the authorities tried a different tactic a few years later.

"Parameswara founded the kingdom of Melaka in the year 1402. True or false?"

Well, half of the students guessed "True" and the other half guessed "False".

Fully 50% passed.

The results were getting pretty acceptable by now but still not good enough. Most other countries would be satisfied with a 50% passing rate, but not us. We are a better country, because we are a boleh country. The authorities then cracked their heads and then came out with this one:

Read the following sentence carefully.

"Parameswara, the cousin of Proton-Iswara, founded the kingdom of Melaka in the year 1402..
Underline the name of the person who founded Melaka."

60% underlined "Parameswara",
30% underlined "Proton-Iswara" and
10% underlined "1402"

Yeah!!!!....60% managed to pass!
So krever!

But for some reason, the authorities were still not contented.
So last year, they came out with this gem:

"One day in the year 1402, Parameswara founded the kingdom of Melaka . Then he went home to have dinner. What did he eat?"

13% (smart students) handed in blank answers,
57% wrote "Maggi Mee",
10% wrote " Kentucky Fried Chicken" and
20% wrote "Nasi Lemak".

The correct answer was anything concerning "Food" of course!

After the marking was over, it was found that 87% of the students had passed. 87%!!!!!............now that's pretty impressive!

So now the authorities are very happy that the students are indeed getting smarter?

Well done Boleh-land!

Perhaps, this is why we have a host of students with an impressive string of 'As' who can hardly construct a decent sentence!

Neow mind, our super-duper gomen can find a job for us one.

Duh……


No comments: