How should we judge a government?

In Malaysia, if you don't watch television or read newspapers, you are uninformed; but if you do, you are misinformed!

"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing." - Malcolm X

Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience - Mark Twain

Why we should be against censorship in a court of law: Publicity is the very soul of justice … it keeps the judge himself, while trying, under trial. - Jeremy Bentham

"Our government is like a baby's alimentary canal, with a happy appetite at one end and no
responsibility at the other. " - Ronald Reagan

Government fed by the people

Government fed by the people

Career options

Career options
I suggest government... because nobody has ever been caught.

Corruption so prevalent it affects English language?

Corruption so prevalent it affects English language?
Corruption is so prevalent it affects English language?

When there's too much dirt...

When there's too much dirt...
We need better tools... to cover up mega corruptions.

Prevent bullying now!

Prevent bullying now!
If you're not going to speak up, how is the world supposed to know you exist? “Orang boleh pandai setinggi langit, tapi selama ia tidak menulis, ia akan hilang di dalam masyarakat dan dari sejarah.” - Ananta Prameodya Toer (Your intellect may soar to the sky but if you do not write, you will be lost from society and to history.)

Sunday, November 16, 2008

The truth hurts: our standard of English is falling...

While Patrick Teoh would make fun of someone asking, "You speak Engrand?", in today's Sunday Star, we have a full page of the following dialogue in Reggie Lee’s drawing:

Interviewer: “Are you the student who scored 16As in your exams?”

Interviewee: “Yes, I are.”

and below it:

On The Beat
By WONG CHUN WAI

For our kids’ sake, check the slide
(excerpts):

Our students score As in English at PMR or SPM levels but when it comes to college entrance examinations for UK and US, many of them fare badly.

Now, we read of students in the UPSR for Year Six getting 7As while at the PMR level for Form Three students, they can get up to 9As. In the SPM, there are even those with 16As or more.
It’s good that the choice of exam papers has become wider and candidates have the options of taking their pick. But some principals also impose a restriction on the number of papers a candidate can sit for while some insist on their students taking specific subjects.

But there is a nagging feeling that the standards have dropped. Parents and students get a sense of unrealistic expectations when they get these result slips with straight distinctions.

Our students who scored As in English at PMR or SPM levels may think they are tops and are able to browse through works of Shakespeare with ease.

But the reality is that at college entrance examinations for UK and US colleges, many of them have fared badly.

At job interviews, employers are shocked to find that these A scorers can’t even string a sentence in English correctly and many cannot communicate in the language well.

Parents who have the means to send their children to international or private schools after PMR have found their children being rejected by these schools because tutors found these A scorers not as proficient in the language as their test results suggest.

In short, it is easy to score distinctions because the bell curve is adjusted to reduce the number of failures.
The point is this – we have compromised the quality of our education. We have refused to admit it, preferring to live with the delusion that all is well. Worse, our politicians get carried away sometimes with their rhetoric of “world class education” when they should worry more about the basics of the education system.

We have so many students with so many As who think they deserve to be in medical schools now and get JPA scholarships. It is a bottleneck created by the administration and it doesn’t help that every year, there is a feeling of unfairness in the awarding of these scholarships.

There are now over 60,000 unemployed graduates simply because they are not marketable or they are ill prepared for the job market because of poor linguistic and social skills.

Many are unable to express themselves because of poor communication skills, thus limiting their job options.

We will continue with our euphoria of top scorers, three times a year, and newspapers carry the same stories of such top scorers.

We also know we are not attracting dedicated fresh teachers in schools because we are not paying as much as they deserve.

We know that the level of English among our students are at ICU level, to borrow a hospital term, but we are unlikely to do anything because we lack the political will to face the narrow-minded nationalists, many of whom benefited from the English medium schools of yesteryear or they just lack proficiency in English themselves.

To cover up their inadequacies, they use race and nationalism to stop the advance of English, not realising that those who suffer the most would be the young Malaysians, regardless of their race.

The rich would not be affected because they would be sending their kids overseas but the rest would have to cope with the system.

This is the reality – in 2006, the number of college students who spoke and could write English in India was reportedly 100% while in 10 years, it has been estimated that China would have the largest number of English speakers. As they say, who would have expected this 60 years ago?

English is the language of commerce and science and now, the Internet. Don’t let the slide continue; our children deserve better.

Don't take our words for it, even our Education Minister and incoming Prime Minister send their children to international schools here and then overseas. So much for 'confidence' in our own educational system.

2 comments:

bayi said...

I have interviewed job applicants for about 20 years now. There was this 30+ gentleman who was interviewed for the position of an executive. I asked him if he could write in English. Yes, sir! He proudly produced a letter which appeared to be an application for a job and said that was his final year project! I was shocked!

Final year project indeed!

KoSong Cafe said...

Besides language proficiency, the attitude can be shocking.

I was told that an electronic engineer in a chip-related manufacturing company was giving some instructions to some new graduate recruits. When told to carry out the work, one of them actually said he was expecting technicians to do those work, meaning he is a graduate so those factory hands-on work is beneath him. The engineer had to remind him that he is in a senior position, yet he is expected to do work in certain sections of those process whenever necessary.

Then there is a case to do with personality. Having told that he is successful and to report for work the following week, this chap said he has to consult his father first. He actually came for the interview with his wife. The prospective employer decided there and then that he did not have the necessary leadership qualities and that he had to withdraw his offer!