Might as well include it at the end of the report. Otherwise, how could the Chairman of PAC takes it so lightly, his omission of crucial sentences which might enlighten and strengthen the report?
I am referring to the Malaysiakini report:
Editing of sentences doesn’t affect PAC report, says Hasan
More: https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/338456
and selected readers' comments on
PAC report’s deletion not a mistake but deliberate attempt
'MinahBulat: Public Accounts Committee (PAC) deputy chairperson Tan Seng Giaw, I take objection to your word "mistake" in referring to chairperson Hasan Arifin’s deletion of the two crucial sentences from the PAC report.
A mistake is something that is wrong but was not deliberately done. The PAC, as I understand, had agreed to the working draft. So on what authority did Hasan unilaterally amend the working draft?
How can that be a mistake when he had no authority to do so? The PAC report has to be signed off by the PAC members and the removal of the sentences was detected later.
Tan, this was no mistake but a deliberate attempt to defraud the other PAC members and ultimately the public. Hasan must be referred to a parliamentary select committee for his dastardly act.'
More:
https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/338877
Wikipedia: 'Errors and omissions excepted (E&OE) is a phrase used in an attempt to reduce legal liability for potentially incorrect or incomplete information supplied in a contractually related document such as a quotation or specification.'
Link
I am referring to the Malaysiakini report:
Editing of sentences doesn’t affect PAC report, says Hasan
More: https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/338456
and selected readers' comments on
PAC report’s deletion not a mistake but deliberate attempt
'MinahBulat: Public Accounts Committee (PAC) deputy chairperson Tan Seng Giaw, I take objection to your word "mistake" in referring to chairperson Hasan Arifin’s deletion of the two crucial sentences from the PAC report.
A mistake is something that is wrong but was not deliberately done. The PAC, as I understand, had agreed to the working draft. So on what authority did Hasan unilaterally amend the working draft?
How can that be a mistake when he had no authority to do so? The PAC report has to be signed off by the PAC members and the removal of the sentences was detected later.
Tan, this was no mistake but a deliberate attempt to defraud the other PAC members and ultimately the public. Hasan must be referred to a parliamentary select committee for his dastardly act.'
More:
https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/338877