When I read the article by Awang Hitam, I wish someone would refute his claim that there is apartheid in the private sector based on the definition of apartheid as 'minority rule and discrimination against the majority'. How simplistic, I thought. I am more disappointed because learned Malays still believe in the myth that the Chinese controlled the economy and there is a concerted effort by them to discriminate against the majority Malays. It is debatable that the Chinese controlled the economy, though they might be controlling certain industries over several generations. The common recipe for their success: started by illiterate pioneers serving the needs of the people, saving through thrift and investing for the future. Of course, there were those well connected to political leaders who did well as their cronies, as well as well educated professionals who started on their own or took over from their parents or grandparents, and did very well. As businessmen, their main motive is profit and how to manage it. As to who to employ, it is basically whoever can do the job efficiently. In the case of small and medium enterprises, it is likely to be family controlled and employees engaged through recommendation and word of mouth. If most of the customers are Chinese, then it would be helpful if an employee can communicate with them. Even an English-educated Chinese will fail miserably if he cannot communicate with customers. So basically, there is no concerted effort to discriminate against any race because each Chinese enterprise is independent of others and can even be jealous of each other. Furthermore, even siblings could be arch enemies, so how could they cooperate to discriminate?
Recently, I had a discussion with a car spare parts dealer and his opinion was telling: 'My present Indian employee would scold me if I close shop for a day (because daily paid)... my previous Malay employee would rather work a 3-day week!' Of course this could be a misconception, but to dispel it needs considerable effort to prove otherwise.
Anyway, I was not disappointed when Senior lecturer, Lee Hwok Aun and retired Chartered Engineer, Koon Yew Yin debated over Awang Hitam's article...
Dec 22 2013 New Straits Times: Modern day apartheid? by Awang Hitam
'IT was recently asserted that Malaysia is the only country that still embraces and pursues a policy of apartheid. The article, by one of the presenters and producers of a private business radio station, published in an English daily, further claimed that Malaysia's discriminatory racial policies generate "internal resistance that occasionally spill into violence".
If apartheid means minority rule and discrimination against the majority, then the apartheid system is alive and well in Malaysia.
Read more: Modern day apartheid? - Columnist - New Straits Times http://www.nst.com.my/opinion/columnist/modern-day-apartheid-1.441380#ixzz2pgf7F0qP
Dec 27 2013 Malaysiakini: Apartheid in Malaysia? Let's get at the truth!
'On Dec 23, 2013, the New Sunday Times published an article titled ‘Modern day apartheid?’ by Awang Hitam, in which the assertion was made that apartheid is being practised in the private commercial sector in Malaysia.
Normally, I do not take notice of commentaries found in the NST. It is a newspaper rated poorly for the depth and truthfulness of its news coverage...'
More (subscribers only):
http://beta.malaysiakini.com/news/250311
Dec 30 2013 Free Malaysia Today: Apartheid policies : Let's get at the truth by Koon Yew Yin
Normally, I do not take notice of commentaries found in the NST. It is a newspaper rated poorly for the depth and truthfulness of its news coverage. Although the newspaper has a few journalists who try to maintain a more professional neutrality in their work, the great majority of its editorial staff are political hacks, out to put the best spin on whatever the policy of the government is, as well as to demonise the opponents of the BN and Umno.
However, the recent article ‘Modern Day Apartheid’ by Awang Hitam is so blatantly bold and false in its claim on racial discrimination in Malaysia that it deserves a response.
According to its author:
If apartheid means minority rule and discrimination against the majority, then the apartheid system is alive and well in Malaysia.
For instance, the discrimination in the minority-dominated and controlled private sector is a clear manifestation of this discriminatory policy.'
More:
http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/opinion/2013/12/30/apartheid-policies-lets-get-at-the-truth/
Jan 3 2014 Rejoinder on Apartheid in the private sector by Koon Yew Yin, a retired chartered engineer, is a philanthropist.
Lee Hwok Aun’s response to my post which critiqued Awang Hitam’s New Straits Times article on apartheid in Malaysia’s private sector is disappointing.
Firstly he berates me for not sufficiently challenging the column’s attempt to compare the position of Malaysian Chinese with the white supremacy and apartheid government of South Africa.
Secondly he complains that I have simply relaunched what in his view is “misguided criticism” of his co-authored research.
Instead of focusing his ire on me, Lee Hwok Aun and his co-author should have been the first to respond to Awang Hitam for the way in which the NST columnist cited their research as the columnist’s opening salvo against Malaysian Chinese business practices.
No self-respecting scholar would have permitted his work to be presented as part of the scientific evidence in a scurrilous and mischievous article aimed at inflaming racial sentiments. The fact that the article appears in the country’s premier officially-sanctioned English newspaper makes its arguments and content more provocative since the spin and lies in it reaches influential stake players in the policy-making world.
Although the two researchers have little or no control over how their findings are used, Awang’s piece should have generated an immediate rebuttal from the two researchers. This they failed to do.
More:
http://beta.malaysiakini.com/letters/250803
Jan 6 2014 Awang Hitam using warped logic by Lee Hwok Aun, senior lecturer in development studies at Universiti Malaya.
'I am astounded by the inconsistencies and warped logic in Awang Hitam’s column in the New Straits Times of Dec 22, ‘Modern day Apartheid?’...'
'It is thus dumbfounding and appalling for the author to suggest that under-representation of Malays in the private sector, and possible bias favouring non-Malays, constitutes Apartheid. Suddenly, all the criteria deployed to dispute labelling the NEP as Apartheid vanish, and the only thing that matters is that a minority group holds some advantage.'
'Warped logic is also employed in the assertion that the NEP is not discriminatory - because it was meant to achieve inter-ethnic parity and national unity. Yes, the policy serves these loftier purposes, and Malaysians would readily agree to them.
However, this does not in any way negate the fact that under the NEP, a vast array of policies granting privileged access or exclusive rights to bumiputeras has become established, involving ethnicity-based quotas, reservations or forms of preferential selection.
In the context of the overarching objective and national aspiration, they might be termed positive discrimination. But they are indisputably discriminatory. Let us just acknowledge this without fudging or getting heated.
In the spirit of honesty, as exhorted by the columnist, I hope he will in future adhere to higher standards of consistency and veracity.'
More:
http://beta.malaysiakini.com/letters/251012
Link
Recently, I had a discussion with a car spare parts dealer and his opinion was telling: 'My present Indian employee would scold me if I close shop for a day (because daily paid)... my previous Malay employee would rather work a 3-day week!' Of course this could be a misconception, but to dispel it needs considerable effort to prove otherwise.
Anyway, I was not disappointed when Senior lecturer, Lee Hwok Aun and retired Chartered Engineer, Koon Yew Yin debated over Awang Hitam's article...
Dec 22 2013 New Straits Times: Modern day apartheid? by Awang Hitam
'IT was recently asserted that Malaysia is the only country that still embraces and pursues a policy of apartheid. The article, by one of the presenters and producers of a private business radio station, published in an English daily, further claimed that Malaysia's discriminatory racial policies generate "internal resistance that occasionally spill into violence".
If apartheid means minority rule and discrimination against the majority, then the apartheid system is alive and well in Malaysia.
Read more: Modern day apartheid? - Columnist - New Straits Times http://www.nst.com.my/opinion/columnist/modern-day-apartheid-1.441380#ixzz2pgf7F0qP
Dec 27 2013 Malaysiakini: Apartheid in Malaysia? Let's get at the truth!
'On Dec 23, 2013, the New Sunday Times published an article titled ‘Modern day apartheid?’ by Awang Hitam, in which the assertion was made that apartheid is being practised in the private commercial sector in Malaysia.
Normally, I do not take notice of commentaries found in the NST. It is a newspaper rated poorly for the depth and truthfulness of its news coverage...'
More (subscribers only):
http://beta.malaysiakini.com/news/250311
Dec 30 2013 Free Malaysia Today: Apartheid policies : Let's get at the truth by Koon Yew Yin
Normally, I do not take notice of commentaries found in the NST. It is a newspaper rated poorly for the depth and truthfulness of its news coverage. Although the newspaper has a few journalists who try to maintain a more professional neutrality in their work, the great majority of its editorial staff are political hacks, out to put the best spin on whatever the policy of the government is, as well as to demonise the opponents of the BN and Umno.
However, the recent article ‘Modern Day Apartheid’ by Awang Hitam is so blatantly bold and false in its claim on racial discrimination in Malaysia that it deserves a response.
According to its author:
If apartheid means minority rule and discrimination against the majority, then the apartheid system is alive and well in Malaysia.
For instance, the discrimination in the minority-dominated and controlled private sector is a clear manifestation of this discriminatory policy.'
More:
http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/opinion/2013/12/30/apartheid-policies-lets-get-at-the-truth/
Jan 3 2014 Rejoinder on Apartheid in the private sector by Koon Yew Yin, a retired chartered engineer, is a philanthropist.
Lee Hwok Aun’s response to my post which critiqued Awang Hitam’s New Straits Times article on apartheid in Malaysia’s private sector is disappointing.
Firstly he berates me for not sufficiently challenging the column’s attempt to compare the position of Malaysian Chinese with the white supremacy and apartheid government of South Africa.
Secondly he complains that I have simply relaunched what in his view is “misguided criticism” of his co-authored research.
Instead of focusing his ire on me, Lee Hwok Aun and his co-author should have been the first to respond to Awang Hitam for the way in which the NST columnist cited their research as the columnist’s opening salvo against Malaysian Chinese business practices.
No self-respecting scholar would have permitted his work to be presented as part of the scientific evidence in a scurrilous and mischievous article aimed at inflaming racial sentiments. The fact that the article appears in the country’s premier officially-sanctioned English newspaper makes its arguments and content more provocative since the spin and lies in it reaches influential stake players in the policy-making world.
Although the two researchers have little or no control over how their findings are used, Awang’s piece should have generated an immediate rebuttal from the two researchers. This they failed to do.
More:
http://beta.malaysiakini.com/letters/250803
Jan 6 2014 Awang Hitam using warped logic by Lee Hwok Aun, senior lecturer in development studies at Universiti Malaya.
'I am astounded by the inconsistencies and warped logic in Awang Hitam’s column in the New Straits Times of Dec 22, ‘Modern day Apartheid?’...'
'It is thus dumbfounding and appalling for the author to suggest that under-representation of Malays in the private sector, and possible bias favouring non-Malays, constitutes Apartheid. Suddenly, all the criteria deployed to dispute labelling the NEP as Apartheid vanish, and the only thing that matters is that a minority group holds some advantage.'
'Warped logic is also employed in the assertion that the NEP is not discriminatory - because it was meant to achieve inter-ethnic parity and national unity. Yes, the policy serves these loftier purposes, and Malaysians would readily agree to them.
However, this does not in any way negate the fact that under the NEP, a vast array of policies granting privileged access or exclusive rights to bumiputeras has become established, involving ethnicity-based quotas, reservations or forms of preferential selection.
In the context of the overarching objective and national aspiration, they might be termed positive discrimination. But they are indisputably discriminatory. Let us just acknowledge this without fudging or getting heated.
In the spirit of honesty, as exhorted by the columnist, I hope he will in future adhere to higher standards of consistency and veracity.'
More:
http://beta.malaysiakini.com/letters/251012
.
ReplyDelete.
.
Dear Sir,
I have spent not as much time as
Tycoon Koon in engineering but a
respectable amount of time in and
outside the gomen service
appraising engineering
components for the gomen and
personal use.
Recently I met a bangla
who used to work with a chinese
owned spare parts shop in
Segambut. When he started working
in 2000 the firm had a dozen
workers -presumably all Banglas.
Now the firm had a workforce in
the hundredsand had moved into
a bigger and proper factory
elsewhere.
|
'What new thing was he [owner] doing?', I asked.
|
Firm got old cars /trucks from
overseas and
get vietnamese and banglas to
strip them and use chemical wash
to make the parts look new
and repack them
nicely and send them to all the
spareparts shop throughout
Malaysia
He said Malaysia is a great
country- easy to be v rich and
gomen guys can be paid off easily.
As one who appraised product for
approval,it had become a habit
that I would appraise
what I had bought for myself , my
son or other family members.
I found many of the
products sold by the spare parts
are probably
recycled unless one goes to the
authorised agents . One item that
invariably gives problem to an
engine, especially if it is
diesel is the lubricant. If the
lube oil is not genuine ,
the wear and tear on a
car and the nature [colour] of the
exhaust is suspect. One indication
is too much smoke.
If you go to a street spare part
shop, they will not have a Shell
engine oil. I have to
source mine from a dealer about 8
km from [I buy in 20l drums]
where I lived!
Why does a spare part shop not use
a Melayu, local Indian or even c
chinese?
The simple reason most of them are
involved in passing fakes or non
genuine as genuine products.
It is ok if one goes to a 'potong
kereta'and
get a secondhand parts and pays a
reaonable price for it.
Melayus [granted are not strong
physically and perceived to be
lazy by nature ], and
Indians are not much better , are
dangereous to have in dubious
business enterprise.
One interesting thing the bangla
told me. Firm will
not do on a german brand because
the germans in
Malaysia monitors closely the
movement of their parts.
One day, a neighbour, a seemingly
rich tycoon involved in the
spare parts business was raided by
a team involving
the Police, KPDKK , Relas and some
Germans. Apparently
from what I can see, I can only
guess the germans had
prodded the gomen guys about the
towkay exporting
german car parts not sourced from
germany.
I leave the conclusion open as I
leave by a policy I do my
business, you do yours
khong khek khuat
.
.
.