Friday, January 25, 2013

Steve Jobs was a rotten Apple?


"Apple, Google and Intel are being sued for striking a secret agreement among themselves not to poach employees from each other. Which is, um, how should we put this? Not kosher? "Likely illegal," is how Ed Colligan, former CEO of Palm, described it when they asked him to join the devil's bargain. Because, yeah. Turns out it's frowned upon when companies collude to keep workers from making as much money as they can.

The pact now may come back to haunt these companies as employees are suing them over lost wages. The damages could run into the hundreds of millions.

But the best part, as always, is the treasure trove of documents coming out in discovery. The best ones are the ones that show Apple CEO Steve Jobs throwing temper tantrums and threatening lawsuits when competitors hire away his engineers.  (The Verge has a great rundown with lots of documents.)"...


"Keep in mind that the real victims of what Jobs was proposing are front-line engineers whose incomes would be constrained because their bosses had struck a deal not to poach from one another. This was rich guys making deals to screw their engineers and boost their own profits."

More:
News Flash: Steve Jobs Bullied Rivals And Was Kind Of A Dick
http://readwrite.com/2013/01/23/news-flash-steve-jobs-bullied-rivals-and-was-kind-of-a-dick

Link

1 comment:

  1. Anonymous9:14 pm

    .

    .


    .

    From past cases 9in the uk

    an employer to make a restraint of

    trade clause on his employee

    preventing him to open a

    competitive business

    near his premise within a

    reasonable period of time.


    In the case of Apple and its cahoots

    ,employer A makes contracts with

    other rivals B,C ...X to

    restraint its employee

    from getting a better wage/job.


    It looks similar to the above

    reasoning.

    On the grounds of pro -business

    which

    the US courts are willing to help

    protect, Apple and its cahoots may

    just get away with such a policy.


    If one were to read cases in

    Australia,

    a son purportedly lost at sea [1]

    was not allowed to claim from his

    own dad's

    estate on public policy grounds!
    .

    .
    \


    kkk


    [1] the son was on a voyage and

    the ship

    met a storm and was shipwrecked

    on an island. Somehow he survived

    and managed to make his way back

    to Australia.


    .


    .


    .
    ips

    ReplyDelete